I've been a long time reader of reviews and critical analysis of theatre productions. When I began working in theatre more and more, some people who were close to me suggested I look into the possibility of becoming a "critic". I balked at the idea, saying that I could never voice my opinion for all to see or hear. I could share my thoughts with friends, but with the public? Not a chance!
Now I sit at my computer screen, contemplating my next review, and writing this blog.
I heard Kevin Wallace (one of the producers of The Lord Of The Rings) talking about some of the reasons why LOTR will be closing on September 3rd earlier this week. One of the reasons mentioned was the critics response to the show. It was almost universally panned, which is never a good sign for a show.
While I understand his views on the media, I can't accept them.
The job of a critic is to look at a production and all its elements - from the performances, to the direction and design elements. We may not like certain elements or performances. In fact, it's possible we don't like anything about a production, but the thing is, is that it is OUR opinion.
Those of you who read my reviews and those of my colleagues in the newspapers or other media sources, shouldn't take what we have to say as the be all and end all. Read the reviews, read a plot summary, and then make a decision for yourself. You may be surprised at what you see.
There have been times (prior to me beginning to write critical reviews) that I have read reviews, seen a show anyway, and completely disagreed with the review that I had read. It is possible that the reviewer was wrong. Again, it's only one persons opinion. Don't let our reviews of show influence your decision to see a show or not...get out there and take a chance, and then form your own opinion of it.
Do I agree that the critics killed The Lord Of The Rings? No. Lack of audiences did.
Until next time,
Mike